Influence of site and rate of low-volume aerial phosphite spray on lesion development of Phytophthora cinnamomi and phosphite persistence in Lambertia inermis var. inermis and Banksia grandis
The influence of site on effectiveness of low-volume spray of phosphite for the control of Phytophthora cinnamomi was compared between sites differing in soil nutrient status. The sites ranged from infertile deep grey sands to a red loamin the Esperance Plains bioregion, and infertile gravelly sand of the Havel site-vegetation type P to a red loam of Havel site-vegetation type Q in the northern Jarrah Forest bioregion. Following low-volume spray of 0, 24 or
48 kg phosphite/ha, phosphite effectiveness was determined from assessment of rate of colonisation and inhibition of stem colonisation by P. cinnamomi, and stem phosphite concentration in challenge inoculation stems of Lambertia inermis var. inermis in Esperance Plains bioregion sites and Banksia grandis in Jarrah Forest bioregion sites. Phosphite effectiveness was mainly influenced by plant species rather than site. Phosphite spray significantly controlled P. cinnamomi colonisation in B. grandis, but not in L. inermis var. inermis. Site had no consistent influence on the effect of phosphite on P. cinnamomi despite large differences in soil nutrient status between sites. Differences between sites and site ranking changed with inoculation time and rate of phosphite spray, and duplicate sites differed significantly fromeach other. Site, rate of phosphite spray, time after spray and plant species significantly affected stem phosphite concentrations. In both Esperance Plains bioregion and Jarrah Forest bioregion sites, stem phosphite concentrations were greatest in fertile loam sites and least in infertile sand or gravelly sand sites. Stem phosphite concentrations increasedwith rate of phosphite spray with concentrations in stems receiving 48 kg phosphite/ha being 1.2 to 3-times-greater than that in stem sprayed with 24 kg phosphite/ha. Six months after low-volume spray, phosphite concentrations in L. inermis var. inermis stems had declined for all sites and spray rates to only 4–17% of original concentrations. Decline of phosphite concentrations in B. grandis stems was slower than that for L. inermis var. inermis stems. The results indicate that effectiveness of phosphite against P. cinnamomi infection in different communities will depend more on plant species composition than soil nutrient status. Differences in phosphite effectiveness between plant species may be related to differences in phosphite concentration thresholds yet to be quantified, above which tissue concentrations must be achieved before inhibition of P. cinnamomi colonisation occurs. In rapid colonisation/phosphite low-responsive species such as L. inermis var. inermis, the threshold may be greater than that required for a response in a rapid colonisation/phosphite high-response species such as B. grandis. These results demonstrate the need to determine thresholds for individual plant species and in different environments.
Full Text